Chief Alchemist - Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach
Share ChiefAlchemist.com. RSS 2.0 feed for ChiefAlchemist.com. Sign up for the mailing list. Follow Chief Alchemist on Twitter. 'Like' the Chief Alchemist's page on Facebook. See what Chief Alchemist has been Q&A'ing on Quora. Chief Alchemist bookmarks & highlights on Diigo.com. Follow the Chief Alchemist on Digg.com. Chief Alchemist channel on Last.fm. Chief Alchemist on Flickr. Mark 'Chief Alchemist' Simchock on LinkedIn. Free Initial Consultation. Email Chief Alchemist. Phone Chief Alchemist.
  • Mark ‘Chief Alchemist’ Simchock
  • 'Email me.Email => ca .at. ChiefAlchemist .dot. com
  • 'Phone me.Alchemy United => 732 997-0028
  •  
  • Free initial consultation.Free => Initial Consultation
  • Please be sure to subscribe to your communication channels of choice.
  • Click To Close => The small green (consultation), red (email) or blue (phone) icons in the top upper right.
CURRENT “TOP 10” TOPICS TOOLS CLIENTS & PROJECTS SOURCES SEARCH HIDE
Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach

Perhaps it’s time to retire the multi-column layout?

Consumed => “Adopting A Responsive WordPress Theme Is More Than Install-And-Go” by Ben Gremillion on Smashing Magazine.

http://wp.smashingmagazine.com/2012/07/26/adopting-responsive-wordpress-theme

=> My value add (i.e., left a comment)…

While not exactly WordPress-centric, good stuff. Thanks Ben.

A couple things to add:

You said: “But a better option would be to consider using a device-agnostic approach to Web design focusing on content rather than device properties.” As well as, “If the secondary content is unnecessary, how should it disappear?

I think this raises a very interesting question. That is, why do responsive at all? Wait! Let me explain. That is, why not just imagine the smallest device / screen size and build for that and only that? Yeah it sounds a bit crazy but let me finish. My point is (and being the minimalist that I prefer to be), secondary content that is unnecessary doesn’t become necessary just because there’s real estate at a wider width. Either content is important, or it isn’t, correct? So perhaps the two / three/ four column layout model – much like flashing text and crazy animated gifs – should be a thing of the past?

To this I add, there’s a UX consistency factor. Should a user / visitor really have to learn and know two versions of every site? That hardly sounds user friendly to me. Unless there’s a law that says every pixel hhas to be used then I honestly don’t think a single “small screen optimized” site is wrong. It can’t be wrong. There’s no rule / law to break, right?

I realize this question I’ve tabled is somewhat philosophical / theoretical. None the less it seem to me that it’s worth discussing. To some extent it often feels like someone said, “Responsive…” and no one stopped to ask, “Oh really? Why?”.

On a side note, I’ve seen WP themes marketed as responsive and then use hover navs. Kinda funny, yes?

Required.
Will not be published. Required.
Please include http://