Chief Alchemist - Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach
Share ChiefAlchemist.com. RSS 2.0 feed for ChiefAlchemist.com. Sign up for the mailing list. Follow Chief Alchemist on Twitter. 'Like' the Chief Alchemist's page on Facebook. See what Chief Alchemist has been Q&A'ing on Quora. Chief Alchemist bookmarks & highlights on Diigo.com. Follow the Chief Alchemist on Digg.com. Chief Alchemist channel on Last.fm. Chief Alchemist on Flickr. Mark 'Chief Alchemist' Simchock on LinkedIn. Free Initial Consultation. Email Chief Alchemist. Phone Chief Alchemist.
  • Mark ‘Chief Alchemist’ Simchock
  • 'Email me.Email => ca .at. ChiefAlchemist .dot. com
  • 'Phone me.Alchemy United => 732 997-0028
  •  
  • Free initial consultation.Free => Initial Consultation
  • Please be sure to subscribe to your communication channels of choice.
  • Click To Close => The small green (consultation), red (email) or blue (phone) icons in the top upper right.
CURRENT “TOP 10” TOPICS TOOLS CLIENTS & PROJECTS SOURCES SEARCH HIDE
Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach

How to build a better password

Consumed => “Tool Kit: How to Devise Passwords That Drive Hackers Away” by Nicole Perlroth on NY Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/technology/personaltech/how-to-devise-passwords-that-drive-hackers-away.html

It would help if there was an industry standard for length allowed, as well as which characters were considered valid. At least then, if you used some sort of formula that you kept in your head, you wouldn’t have to keep track of multiple versions of that formula. For example, some sites seem to allow shift characters (e.g., $, #, etc.) while others do not. Having to remember which is which only complicates the process.

Another helpful solution would be to add a second password. Kind of like a PIN number, if you will. Two unknowns to crack has to be more difficult than just one.

The reason people use the same password is because it’s far too difficult to do otherwise. You’d think by now there would be a better way. Unfortunately, those who need to solve the problem are not the ones who are most often effected by it. Or so it seems.

Required.
Will not be published. Required.
Please include http://