GitHub and blog posts vs books and finding a mentor
Consumed => “Team Collaboration for Building with Open Source Code” by Jake Rocheleau on Speckyboy Design Magazine.
=> My value add (i.e., left a comment)…
Good stuff Jake, three quick thoughts:
1) I believe Trello is popular with developers/engineers because its metaphor (if you will) maps well to the agile methodology. For those who are interested, here’s a link to a free copy of Agile for Dummies: https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/iwm/web/signup.do?source=swg-rtl-sd-wp&S_PKG=500026415
1.5) For PM, Asana (http://Asana.com) is also worth a mention.
2) Agreed, there is plenty of code to find. The issue is, which 50% of it constitutes higher quality and best practices, and which does not? The point is, it’s very easy to pick up bad habits and very hard to identify those that are best in class. GitHub and blog posts still don’t replace books and finding a mentor.
3) That said, when writing code, we should all be more mindful that there’s a good chance that someone else might see and use that code. Cryptic variable / method names are so 20th century at this point and should, in 2013, be considered unacceptable. Lack of comments is not a best practice. Period! We need to shift from judging code on how complex (and un-understandable) it is, and give points to how its able to turn complexity understood by one (or a few) into something that is clear, transparent and usable to as many as possible. Is that not the true intention of Open Source? GitHub, JSFiddle, etc. are supposed to be a valuable resources, not garbage dumps, yes?