Chief Alchemist - Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach
Share RSS 2.0 feed for Sign up for the mailing list. Follow Chief Alchemist on Twitter. 'Like' the Chief Alchemist's page on Facebook. See what Chief Alchemist has been Q&A'ing on Quora. Chief Alchemist bookmarks & highlights on Follow the Chief Alchemist on Chief Alchemist channel on Chief Alchemist on Flickr. Mark 'Chief Alchemist' Simchock on LinkedIn. Free Initial Consultation. Email Chief Alchemist. Phone Chief Alchemist.
  • Mark ‘Chief Alchemist’ Simchock
  • 'Email me.Email => ca .at. ChiefAlchemist .dot. com
  • 'Phone me.Alchemy United => 732 997-0028
  • Free initial consultation.Free => Initial Consultation
  • Please be sure to subscribe to your communication channels of choice.
  • Click To Close => The small green (consultation), red (email) or blue (phone) icons in the top upper right.
Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach

Fighting the duplicate content beast

Consumed => “Duplicate Content – How Many Homepages Do You Have?” by Bryan Phelps on SEO.

=> My value add (i.e., left a comment)…

Thanks for the reminder Bryan.

However, isn’t this what canonical is supposed to cure? This is especially true if you’re tagging your inbound links and they’re being shared back out again. Depending on the tagging a given page could have 10s or even 100s of unique URLs, right? And thus the support for canonical, yes?

Granted it’s subjective, but sticking with the www seems dated to me. We no longer see ads with Nor does TV or radio verbalize the www. It’s No one under 40 expects the www, do they? My belief is, the shorter and less cluttered the URL / link the better. The www doesn’t add any value. It’s time to kiss it good-bye. IMHO, of course.

Will not be published. Required.
Please include http://