<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Do Facebook Likes still have any currency?</title> <atom:link href="http://chiefalchemist.com/do-facebook-likes-still-have-any-currency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://chiefalchemist.com/do-facebook-likes-still-have-any-currency/</link> <description>Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic &#38; Intelligent Approach</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 15:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chief Alchemist</title><link>http://chiefalchemist.com/do-facebook-likes-still-have-any-currency/#comment-7255</link> <dc:creator>Chief Alchemist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:38:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chiefalchemist.com/?p=3573#comment-7255</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi Nial. Trust me, I feel your pain. While I have yet to be sucked into such a mindless and pointless Twitter-spat, I have at times (been human) and missed the turn for the high road.Let&#039;s move on.btw, how about a post on how you went about monetizing that page? Did you use AdSense? What did you learn about placing the ads, etc? If there was a gem in there, I think that might be it. For me, that makes more sense than the FB Likes trick.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nial. Trust me, I feel your pain. While I have yet to be sucked into such a mindless and pointless Twitter-spat, I have at times (been human) and missed the turn for the high road.</p><p>Let&#8217;s move on.</p><p>btw, how about a post on how you went about monetizing that page? Did you use AdSense? What did you learn about placing the ads, etc? If there was a gem in there, I think that might be it. For me, that makes more sense than the FB Likes trick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Niall harbison</title><link>http://chiefalchemist.com/do-facebook-likes-still-have-any-currency/#comment-7253</link> <dc:creator>Niall harbison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://chiefalchemist.com/?p=3573#comment-7253</guid> <description><![CDATA[Shame it disappointed you as that is probably my fault for getting involved in that sort of stuff! Some of those likes don&#039;t do us a ton of good but plenty of them do. I guess it is like people reading your site. 90% of them might be useful and 10% might not but it&#039;s all public and you can&#039;t really choose who reads your posts!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame it disappointed you as that is probably my fault for getting involved in that sort of stuff! Some of those likes don&#8217;t do us a ton of good but plenty of them do. I guess it is like people reading your site. 90% of them might be useful and 10% might not but it&#8217;s all public and you can&#8217;t really choose who reads your posts!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic

Served from: chiefalchemist.com @ 2013-05-21 18:15:46 -->