Chief Alchemist - Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach
Share RSS 2.0 feed for Sign up for the mailing list. Follow Chief Alchemist on Twitter. 'Like' the Chief Alchemist's page on Facebook. See what Chief Alchemist has been Q&A'ing on Quora. Chief Alchemist bookmarks & highlights on Follow the Chief Alchemist on Chief Alchemist channel on Chief Alchemist on Flickr. Mark 'Chief Alchemist' Simchock on LinkedIn. Free Initial Consultation. Email Chief Alchemist. Phone Chief Alchemist.
  • Mark ‘Chief Alchemist’ Simchock
  • 'Email me.Email => ca .at. ChiefAlchemist .dot. com
  • 'Phone me.Alchemy United => 732 997-0028
  • Free initial consultation.Free => Initial Consultation
  • Please be sure to subscribe to your communication channels of choice.
  • Click To Close => The small green (consultation), red (email) or blue (phone) icons in the top upper right.
Business Consulting For The 21st Century Via A Holistic & Intelligent Approach

A system is a system is a system

Consumed => “Design Systems: Building for the Future” by Ara Abcarians on CSS Tricks.

=> My value add (i.e., left a comment)…

Great stuff. Thanks for the inspiration. No doubt this gets filed under: “If it were easy, everyone would do it.”

A couple thoughts:

1) While I appreciate the effort to develop your own framework, if you think of the entire effort as an integrated end-to-end system then to me it makes more sense to maintain modularity across all vectors within the system. A specific example would be the human resources slice and training. That is, finding someone who is Bootstrap-centric is going to be much easier than finding someone who knows your system (i.e., which is no one aside from the people you hire and train). Yours might be a better mouse trap, but does the benefit outweigh the added friction?

2) Mind you, I understand there were extenuating circumstance, but to build out a framework because design was done in a silo / void also feels a bit “out of character” to me. Or as I like to ask: Name me a successful product company that does product design without any consideration for manufacturing. Toyota, for example, certainly doesn’t design a product (i.e., car) and then ask, “Okay, how are we going to build this? At a price the market will bear?” It’s an integrated system, not a series of silos connected by some spit & scotch tape process., yes?

3) Which leads me to: Ara (or Chris) is any any chance of taking these concepts and ideals and doing an article / series to discuss how to (best) apply them in an agency setting? That is, one team (read: some core, some revolving) servicing many clients / brands? What are the must-dos, the watch-out-fors, etc.? How do you build a core tool box and then extend and customize that for individual projects and/or clients?

Will not be published. Required.
Please include http://